Short Film · Oct 5, 2026

Crab Pulsar with Claude Code (Opus 5.5, max effort)

Crab Pulsar with Claude Code (Opus 5.5, max effort) by Commercial_Event534, credited to Claude Opus 5.5. Watch the Short Film video, explore the shared prompt…

Commercial_Event534u/Commercial_Event534
View on Reddit
Opus 5.5
5 net upvotes on Reddit, checked Oct 15, 2026

Open the original Reddit post for the version with sound.

From the creator’s post · Commercial_Event534 on Reddit
I love neutron stars! I made this video with Claude Code (Opus 5.5 on max effort). YouTube in 4K: [https://youtu.be/QEtKoiASw8g](https://youtu.be/QEtKoiASw8g) I hope you enjoy it. Claude: This is a 3.5-minute film that starts on the real Chandra X-ray image of the Crab Nebula and flies down to 20 miles above the pulsar's surface, with narration and an original score. The star's size, its spin (about 30 times a second) and the way its gravity bends light are calculated. The glowing plasma, the beams and the colours are artistic. How Claude Code made it \- My opening prompt: "I'd like you to create a video showing what a neutron star like the Crab Pulsar would look like if you were, say, a 500 miles away from it, or maybe 1,000 miles: close enough to see the detail of what's happening. Take all the time you need, and ask me any questions you have." \- Then I gave feedback after each version. There were four in the end. For example: make it cinematic rather than…
From the creator

The prompt behind it.

Original prompt
I'd like you to create a video showing what a neutron star like the Crab Pulsar would look like if you were, say, a 500 miles away from it, or maybe 1,000 miles: close enough to see the detail of what's happening. Take all the time you need, and ask me any questions you have."

\- Then I gave feedback after each version. There were four in the end. For example: make it cinematic rather than educational, open on the real Chandra image, use a less AI-sounding voice, make the surface solid, and do a genuinely close pass.

\- Claude wrote its own renderer in Python and PyTorch, running on my RTX 4090. Every pixel's light ray is traced through the star's gravity, and it tested this against an exact solver.

\- It rendered the film at 4K and 60 fps in 10-second chunks, then joined them with ffmpeg.

\- The narration is text-to-speech made on my PC (Chatterbox), with Whisper checking that every line came out word-perfect. The music was synthesised in code.

\- It kept a sources file saying whether each number is measured (for example, Jodrell Bank's timing data for the spin), assumed or derived.

\- It checked its own work by looking at the rendered frames.



Codex vs Claude

I also asked Codex (GPT-6 Astra on max) to make one, to compare: [https://youtu.be/NLYXqp21-IA](https://youtu.be/NLYXqp21-IA)

Claude saw Codex's versions a few times along the way, so it's not a strict head-to-head. Which do you like more?



Inspiration: Brian Cox, Wonders of the Universe, episode 3 "Falling", from 32:29: [https://youtu.be/pGxyFOTUPZE?t=1949](https://youtu.be/pGxyFOTUPZE?t=1949)

Opening images: Chandra X-ray Observatory, November 2000 to April 2001 (NASA/CXC/ASU/J. Hester et al.).
More Short Film prompts from real videos

Video and prompt by Commercial_Event534. Original post ↗

Is this your work? Add the badge

Paste this on your site or README to link people to this page.

Featured on motif
<a href="https://createmotion.io/motions/reddit-1wy2zce/"><img src="https://createmotion.io/featured-on-motif.svg" alt="Featured on motif" width="188" height="44"></a>